Many thanks to those who joined the call last night, and to those who were with us in spirit. All I can say is, wow! We are off to a great start. I am so appreciative of who you all are, and the difference you are committed to making.
See below for notes, including next steps. If you’d like to be on the smaller team that’s convening next, please let me know ASAP and we’ll get you in the scheduling loop!
ACCESSING THE RECORDED CALL ——————————————
The replay line is 218-936-1055, PASSCODE 77869#
Attendees: Andrea Howe, Charlie Green, Melissa Pippine, Vickie Turley, Valerie Murphy, Dr. Jeff Schlichter, Gail Guseman, Hang Pham-Swami, Ruth Fields, Randy Guseman, Chris Hajzak
Unable to Attend: Alison Welch, Lisa Witt, Dennis Mondoro, Alona Fayer, Cary Paul, Jonathan Spector, Rod Rogers, Mary Morrison
NEXT STEPS ———————————————————————
- Convene a smaller group to further define the project: create a project mission statement, define the candidate list of interventions, etc. Participants so far include Vickie, Gail, Jeff, Melissa, Chris, Valerie, and Andrea.
- Re-convene the larger group to review, discuss, move forward!
HOW WE’RE ALREADY IN ACTION ——————————————-
- Charlie has volunteered to create a blog for us to post/exchange ideas and generally create community around this project.
- Vickie has volunteered to support us administratively. I’ve asked her to manage the scheduling of the next two meetings
Many thanks to you both!
THE CASE FOR NATIONAL SERVICE ——————————————-
Here’s a link to the article Jeff referenced (thanks, Vickie!) http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1657256_1657317,00.html
NOTES FROM THE CALL ——————————————————–
Inspiration to Join the Call (a few shares):
- “I have kids, step-kids, and have watched other spouses in relationships – and all kinds of dysfunction result. There’s a lot of psychic good to be gained from a project like this.”
- “I am married with 4 children, and became a “stepchild” as an adult. This is an inspiration of Andrea’s that I can see a role for myself in.”
- “I married my husband 16 years ago – we each had two children. “Expanded” families – and all the complexities associated with them – are becoming a reality more and more. *Anything* we can do to help is important.”
Key Questions (and some answers):
- What is the right first intervention? Is it a shared volunteer experience? Or simply an opportunity for adults of expanded families to clearly define roles and begin to communicate more effectively? Volunteering may be a later-stage intervention. On the other hand, volunteering offers an opportunity to be in the same room in a non-tense environment (compared to school meetings or other ways divorced parents are usually required to come together). It is a way for everyone to be together that strengthens everyone. Children can benefit enormously when seeing adults interact favorably.
- Is the focus on working with the adults, the kids, or both? (Answer tied to decision about right first intervention.)
- What if one parent is amenable and the other is not? Do we need to target families that are “evolved” to a certain extent? In Jeff’s experience, all you need is one willing adult and remarkable things can be created from there.
- What makes it easier for adults to accept the reality of others step-parenting their children? Being OK with yourself, and shifting your context (e.g., seeing my ex-husbands new wife as my daughter’s ‘aunt’ rather than her step-mother).
- Is the project primarily delivered virtually, or in-person? Can technology really work here? Jeff has been amazed by the power of virtual groups and the cohesion that is quickly created. Blog technology is great way to tell stories, interact with each other, help to strengthen others. Would be great to make as simple and low infrastructure as possible so opportunities could be available/replicated anywhere in country – create something contagious and relatively easy to maintain. A counselor could jump in at key junctures. School programs (face-to-face) already in existence could also be helpful.
Project Leadership:
- Chris is interested in playing a leadership role and must deal realistically with time constraints
- Ruth and Vickie can think of others who would love to be involved, but don’t want to speak for them
- For most, it will be easier to decide whether or not a leadership role is a good fit when the project is more clearly defined.